Name File Type Size Last Modified
test.txt text/plain 1.9 KB 06/03/2025 12:38:PM

Project Citation: 

Zhao, Tao, University of Michigan, ok, test, uuu, oks, YYYzzz, empty, and Affiliation, No. test tao self publish. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2025-07-14. https://doi.org/10.81037/E111389V22

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Now you are in the Workspace of you Project. Only Principal Investigator(s) and Summary are required. Enter any test data you would like.mmm
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Aging (grant-111); National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (grant-112); ● National Institutes of Health National Institute of Nursing Research (grant-113); test empty org (grant-114)

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms standardized tests; microeconomics; academic libraries; Michigan Firearm Law; act
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage North Carolina, TGest, Oklahoma, united states
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 2222 – 3333 (2222-33); 2222 – 3333
Collection Date(s):  View help for Collection Date(s) 11/11/2000 – 11/11/2025
Universe:  View help for Universe This is a test universe.

OK.
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) administrative records data; aggregate data; audio: sound data; census/enumeration data; clinical data; event/transaction data; experimental data; geographic information system (GIS) data; images: photographs, drawings, graphical representations; medical records; observational data; program source code; text; video: film, animation, etc.
Collection Notes:  View help for Collection Notes test notesjjjjjj

Methodology

Response Rate:  View help for Response Rate For Part 1 (Law Enforcement Interview Quantitative Data), 292 individuals were contacted for the telephone survey. Of these contacts, 82 were ineligible to participate because they reported having no familiarity or experience working on trafficking cases. There were a total of 121 completed surveys and 89 non-responses (11 refusals and 78 non-contacts). The response rate for the telephone surveys was 58 percent. For Part 2 (Case File Review Qualitative Data) response rates are not applicable.
Sampling:  View help for Sampling

For Part 1 (Law Enforcement Interview Quantitative Data), 292 individuals were contacted for the telephone survey. Of these contacts, 82 were ineligible to participate because they reported having no familiarity or experience working on trafficking cases. There were a total of 121 completed surveys and 89 non-responses (11 refusals and 78 non-contacts). The response rate for the telephone surveys was 58 percent. For Part 2 (Case File Review Qualitative Data) response rates are not applicable.

Data Source:  View help for Data Source external data source.
Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) coded on-site observation; coded video observation; cognitive assessment test; face-to-face interview; mail questionnaire; mixed mode; on-site questionnaire; other; record abstracts
Scales:  View help for Scales List any commonly known scales used to collect data for the study (e.g., psychological scales such as MMPI and CPI, or occupational scales such as the Census Occupational Codes). The inclusion of a common scale should be identified in the documentation associated with this dataset and confirmed by variable names or labels. If the questionnaire used has a finite list of responses, such as "Always," "Sometimes," "Rarely," and "Never," or "Strongly Agree," "Agree," "Disagree," and "Strongly Disagree," then enter in this field, "A Likert-type scale was used," or "Several Likert-type scales were used." The scales can be cited either as a list or described in full sentences.
Weights:  View help for Weights A weight variable with two implied decimal places has been included and must be used in any analysis.
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Census Tract, year, Family
Geographic Unit:  View help for Geographic Unit ZIP code tabulation area

Related Publications

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.