A newer version of this project is available. See below for other available versions.
test tao self publish
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Tao Zhao, University of Oklahoma; University of Michigan
Version: View help for Version V4
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
text/plain | 1.9 KB | 06/03/2025 12:38:PM |
Project Citation:
Zhao, Tao, and University of Michigan. test tao self publish. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2025-06-11. https://doi.org/10.81037/E111389V4
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Now you are in the Workspace of you Project. Only Principal Investigator(s) and Summary are required. Enter any test data you would like.
Funding Sources:
View help for Funding Sources
University of Michigan (Grant-123);
University of Oklahoma (Grant-456);
University of Chicago (grant-222)
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
standardized tests;
Michigan Firearm Law;
microeconomics;
academic libraries
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
Florida
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
2222 – 3333 (2222-33)
Collection Date(s):
View help for Collection Date(s)
11/11/2000 – 11/11/2025
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
administrative records data;
aggregate data;
audio: sound data;
census/enumeration data;
clinical data;
event/transaction data;
experimental data;
geographic information system (GIS) data;
images: photographs, drawings, graphical representations;
medical records;
observational data;
program source code;
text
Collection Notes:
View help for Collection Notes
test
Methodology
Response Rate:
View help for Response Rate
For Part 1 (Law Enforcement Interview Quantitative Data), 292 individuals were contacted for the telephone survey. Of these contacts, 82 were ineligible to participate because they reported having no familiarity or experience working on trafficking cases. There were a total of 121 completed surveys and 89 non-responses (11 refusals and 78 non-contacts). The response rate for the telephone surveys was 58 percent. For Part 2 (Case File Review Qualitative Data) response rates are not applicable.
Sampling:
View help for Sampling
For Part 1 (Law Enforcement Interview Quantitative Data), 292 individuals were contacted for the telephone survey. Of these contacts, 82 were ineligible to participate because they reported having no familiarity or experience working on trafficking cases. There were a total of 121 completed surveys and 89 non-responses (11 refusals and 78 non-contacts). The response rate for the telephone surveys was 58 percent. For Part 2 (Case File Review Qualitative Data) response rates are not applicable.
Data Source:
View help for Data Source
external data source.
Collection Mode(s):
View help for Collection Mode(s)
face-to-face interview;
mail questionnaire;
on-site questionnaire
Scales:
View help for Scales
List any commonly known scales used to collect data for the study (e.g., psychological scales such as MMPI and CPI, or occupational scales such as the Census Occupational Codes). The inclusion of a common scale should be identified in the documentation associated with this dataset and confirmed by variable names or labels. If the questionnaire used has a finite list of responses, such as "Always," "Sometimes," "Rarely," and "Never," or "Strongly Agree," "Agree," "Disagree," and "Strongly Disagree," then enter in this field, "A Likert-type scale was used," or "Several Likert-type scales were used." The scales can be cited either as a list or described in full sentences.
Weights:
View help for Weights
A weight variable with two implied decimal places has been included and must be used in any analysis.
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
united states census tract,
Test,
year,
Individual,
Banks,
Family,
Census tract and year,
Zoos, Aquariums, and Gardens
Geographic Unit:
View help for Geographic Unit
York
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.